Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cherie Phillips and Stoic Church of Philosophy v. Sanderson Beck

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT


January 19, 2011

CHERIE PHILLIPS AND STOIC CHURCH OF PHILOSOPHY, PLAINTIFFS - APPELLANTS,
v.
SANDERSON BECK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS - APPELLEES.

D.C. No. 1:06-cv-00628-SOMKSC Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, Chief Judge, Presiding

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MEMORANDUM*fn1

Submitted January 10, 2011*fn2

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Cherie Phillips appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in her action claiming that Sanderson Beck infringed on her intellectual property rights in her texts including Wisdom Bible of God, Stoic Encheiridion, and Stoic Doctrine. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Filipino Yellow Pages, Inc. v. Asian Journal Publ'ns, Inc., 198 F.3d 1143, 1146 n.2 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Phillips's copyright claims because she did not raise a triable issue as to whether Beck had access to the expanded edition of her Wisdom Bible of God, or as to whether there was a substantial similarity between the Phillips's and Beck's other texts. See Three Boys Music Corp. v. Bolton, 212 F.3d 477, 481 (9th Cir. 2000) ("Absent direct evidence of copying, proof of infringement involves fact-based showings that the defendant had access to the plaintiff's work and that the two works are substantially similar.") (internal quotations and citations omitted).

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Phillips's trademark claim because she did not establish a triable issue as to whether her title, Wisdom Bible of God, had secondary meaning. See Filipino Yellow Pages, 198 F.3d at 1147, 1151.

We decline to consider Phillips's contentions regarding claims that were not raised below. See Dodd v. Hood River Cnty, 59 F.3d 852, 863 (9th Cir. 1995).

We are not persuaded by Phillips's remaining contentions, including those of judicial bias.

AFFIRMED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.