UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 20, 2011
ROBYN JEAN BUCK,
SD COASTLINE LP AND DOES 1-10, [DOC. NO. 7] DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
On October 8, 2010, Plaintiff Robyn Jean Buck ("Buck"), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging improper eviction proceedings related to real property located at 1769 Vale Terrace Drive, Vista, CA 92084, against Defendant SD Coastline LP ("SD Coastline"), and Does 1-10. [Doc. No. 1.] Also on October 8, 2010, Buck filed a Notice of Removal of SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck, case number 10-CV-2108 MMA (NLS). Both cases were assigned to the undersigned pursuant to Civil Local Rule 40.1.d; the cases were not consolidated. On November 19, 2010, the Court remanded SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. [Case No. 10-CV-2108; Doc. No. 14.]
On January 5, 2011, Buck and SD Coastline reached a settlement in SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck, and signed a "Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims." The terms of the agreement included a mutual release of "any and all past, present, and future claims, actions, causes of action . . . which is in any manner or in any event related to . . . disputes in this unlawful detainer action and/or [Robyn Jean Buck's] occupancy of [1769 Vale Terrace Drive, Vista, CA 92084]."
On January 19, 2011, the "Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims" was filed in the instant case and entitled "Joint Motion for Settlement." [Doc. No. 7.] The filing party also submitted a proposed order "Dismissing Entire Action With Prejudice" pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.2.c. The Court has carefully reviewed the settlement stipulation and hereby construes the filing as a Joint Motion for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice.
Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice. [Doc. No. 7.] The Clerk of Court shall terminate the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.