Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Robyn Jean Buck v. Sd Coastline Lp and Does 1-10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 20, 2011

ROBYN JEAN BUCK,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
SD COASTLINE LP AND DOES 1-10, [DOC. NO. 7] DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Michael M. Anello United States District Judge

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

On October 8, 2010, Plaintiff Robyn Jean Buck ("Buck"), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint alleging improper eviction proceedings related to real property located at 1769 Vale Terrace Drive, Vista, CA 92084, against Defendant SD Coastline LP ("SD Coastline"), and Does 1-10. [Doc. No. 1.] Also on October 8, 2010, Buck filed a Notice of Removal of SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck, case number 10-CV-2108 MMA (NLS). Both cases were assigned to the undersigned pursuant to Civil Local Rule 40.1.d; the cases were not consolidated. On November 19, 2010, the Court remanded SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck to the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. [Case No. 10-CV-2108; Doc. No. 14.]

On January 5, 2011, Buck and SD Coastline reached a settlement in SD Coastline LP v. Robyn Jean Buck, and signed a "Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims." The terms of the agreement included a mutual release of "any and all past, present, and future claims, actions, causes of action . . . which is in any manner or in any event related to . . . disputes in this unlawful detainer action and/or [Robyn Jean Buck's] occupancy of [1769 Vale Terrace Drive, Vista, CA 92084]."

On January 19, 2011, the "Settlement Stipulation and Mutual Release of all Claims" was filed in the instant case and entitled "Joint Motion for Settlement." [Doc. No. 7.] The filing party also submitted a proposed order "Dismissing Entire Action With Prejudice" pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.2.c. The Court has carefully reviewed the settlement stipulation and hereby construes the filing as a Joint Motion for Dismissal of Action With Prejudice.

Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the parties' Joint Motion for Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice. [Doc. No. 7.] The Clerk of Court shall terminate the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110120

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.