IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 20, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Before the Court is defendant Paris Moffett's motion for reconsideration, filed 16 January 13, 2011 pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by which 17 motion defendant seeks reconsideration of the Court's January 3, 2011 order denying his 18 motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 19 The Court having read and considered the moving papers, the motion for 20 reconsideration is hereby DENIED, for the reason that defendant has failed to show any 21 cognizable basis for reconsideration exists. 22 Further, to the extent defendant may seek to appeal the instant order, a certificate of 23 appealability is hereby DENIED, for the reason that defendant has not made a "substantial 24 showing of the denial of a constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.