IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 21, 2011
HAYLEY HICKCOX-HUFFMAN, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED PLAINTIFF,
US AIRWAYS, INC., AND DOES 1 (LOCAL RULES 6-2; 7-12) THROUGH, INCLUSIVE.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd
[counsel listed on following page] ** E-filed January 21, 2011 **
STIPULATION REQUESTING (1) ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND (2) STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; PROPOSED ORDER
Defendant would be filing a motion to dismiss. The parties then stipulated to an 5 extension of time for Defendant to respond to the Complaint and for a stipulated 6 briefing schedule on Defendant's anticipated Motion to Dismiss. Doc 6.
January 31, 2011. Doc 6. In lieu of opposing the motion, Plaintiffs will file a First
On November 22, 2010, Plaintiff served her Complaint on Defendant.
Shortly thereafter, counsel for Defendant advised counsel for Plaintiff that Defendant has filed its motion. Doc 13. Plaintiff's Opposition is currently due Amended Complaint on or before January 31, 2011. As a result the parties agree, subject to the Court's approval, to move the stipulated briefing schedule out to correspond to the filing of the First Amended Complaint. In addition, there is a Case Management Conference set for Tuesday, January 25, 2011 at 1:30 pm. In light of the status of the pleadings, the parties stipulate, that with the Court's consent, the Case Management Conference be moved to occur on or after the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. There have been no prior continuances of the Case Management Conference.
Based on the foregoing,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, pursuant to Civil Local
Rule 6-2, by and between counsel for Plaintiff, Hayley Hickcox-Huffman, and counsel for Defendant, US Airways, Inc., as follows:
Date Event 01/31/11 Plaintiff shall file its First Amended Complaint "FAC") 02/14/11 Defendant shall respond to the FAC 03/10/11 Plaintiff shall file its Opposition to any Motion to Dismiss 03/21/11 Defendant shall file a Reply 04/05/11 Hearing on any Motion to Dismiss at 10:00 a.m. 04/26/11 Case Management Conference at 1:30 p.m.
Dated: January 21, 2011 FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM M. ARON By: Thomas G. Foley, Jr. Roger N. Behle, Jr. Justin P. Karczag William M. Aron Attorneys for Plaintiff Dated: January 21, 2011 O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP By: Robert Siegel Michael McGuiness Jessica Hardy Attorneys for Defendant
Defendant's motion to dismiss (Docket No. 13) is TERMINATED.
In addition, all related ADR and Rule 26 deadlines are continued in accordance with the new case management conference date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.