Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Curtis Lee Henderson Sr v. Nunc Pro Tunc

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 21, 2011

CURTIS LEE HENDERSON SR.,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
NUNC PRO TUNC
G. RODRIGUEZ,
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L.Beck United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SUPPLEMENT DISCOVERY RESPONSE (DOC. 58) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC.60)

On November 16, 2010, Defendant filed a motion for a thirty day extension of time to supplement his discovery response. On December 17, 2010, Defendant served his response. Jeffrey Steele Decl., Doc. 62-1. Good cause appearing, and because Defendant served his response by December 17, 2010, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for extension of time to supplement a discovery response is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

On December 3, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against Defendant for failure to timely serve his discovery responses. As the Court is granting Defendant's motion for extension of time to serve his discovery response, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110121

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.