IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 21, 2011
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON SR.,
NUNC PRO TUNC
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Dennis L.Beck United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO SUPPLEMENT DISCOVERY RESPONSE (DOC. 58) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC.60)
On November 16, 2010, Defendant filed a motion for a thirty day extension of time to supplement his discovery response. On December 17, 2010, Defendant served his response. Jeffrey Steele Decl., Doc. 62-1. Good cause appearing, and because Defendant served his response by December 17, 2010, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for extension of time to supplement a discovery response is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
On December 3, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against Defendant for failure to timely serve his discovery responses. As the Court is granting Defendant's motion for extension of time to serve his discovery response, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.