Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Donald M. Wanland

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 21, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DONALD M. WANLAND, JR.,
DEFENDANT.

ORDER AFTER STATUS CONFERENCE APPOINTING COUNSEL, SCHEDULING TRIAL, AND EXCLUDING TIME

This matter came before the Court on January 20, 2011, for a status conference. Assistant U.S. Attorney Samantha S. Spangler appeared on behalf of the United States. Attorney Kresta N. Daly appeared on behalf of the defendant, who was present. Ms. Daly was appointed to represent the defendant.

The Court scheduled a jury trial for September 13, 2011, at 10:30 a.m., and the trial confirming hearing for August 16, 2011, at 9:15 a.m. The Court warned the defendant that if he sought to fire Ms. Daly or sought new counsel, he would represent himself.

The Court excluded time from the Speedy Trial Act calculation through the jury trial date of September 13, 2011, for preparation of counsel, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv) and Local Code T4. The Court found that the interests of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110121

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.