UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 21, 2011
MIKHEIL J. LEINWEBER,
A. DAY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL FIFTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Mikheil J. Leinweber ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding against Defendants Day and Cao for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Day for deprivation of basic necessities in violation of the Eighth Amendment and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment.
On December 27, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to compel production of documents. Defendants have failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants shall file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's motion to compel within fifteen (15) days from the date of service of this order; and
2. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. Local Rule 210.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.