The opinion of the court was delivered by: U.S. Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman
Social Security No. 7 7 4 2
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. Jan 24 2011
X WITH COUNSEL John Early, CJA Appt.
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of X GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of:
Improper Entry by Alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a) and Aiding and Abetting and Causing an Act to Be Done in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2(a), (b) as charged in the Single Count Information
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that: Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that defendant is hereby:
Placed on Probation for a term of one (1) Year.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $10, which is due immediately.
The defendant shall comply with General Order No. 01-05.
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Ernest Rice-Diaz, is hereby placed on probation on the Single-Count Information for a term of one (1) year under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
The defendant shall not commit any violation of local, state or federal law or ordinance; During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment; and
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of future substance abuse.
Defendant waives his right to appeal.
The Court orders the defendant's bond exonerated.
The government moves to dismiss the underlying complaint. ...