UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 26, 2011
JOUBIN MORTEZAPOUR AND SEYED RAZAVI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
DIRECTV, INC. AND DIRECTV HOLDINGS LLC,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: M. James Lorenz United States District Court Judge
ORDER STRIKING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [doc. #10]
Plaintiffs filed this action on October 15, 2010. To which defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on December 22, 2010. Under the Civil Local Rules, plaintiffs were required to file their opposition to defendants' motion by January 24, 2011. Instead of filing a response to defendants' motion on January 24, 2011, plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint.*fn1
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B) allows a party to "amend its pleading once as a matter of course within: . . . (B) . . . 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier. FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(1)(B). After the time has expired, "a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave." FED. R. IV. P. 15(a)(2).
As noted above, defendants filed their motion on December 22, 2010. Plaintiffs were entitled to file a first amended complaint as a matter of course by January 12, 2011. They did not do so, instead waiting until January 24, 2011 to do so. Accordingly, plaintiffs' first amended complaint is untimely.
Based on the foregoing, plaintiffs' first amended complaint is STRICKEN from the record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HON. RUBEN B. BROOKS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALL PARTIES/COUNSEL