UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 26, 2011
TIM VIRGA, WARDEN
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Present: The Honorable Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge
James Munoz None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent:
None Present None Present
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PETITIONER'S ADDRESS
On January 5, 2011, the Court issued an Order Requiring Return to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The service copy of that order sent to petitioner has since been returned to the Court as "Return to Sender. Name and Number Do Not Correspond. Not [unintelligible] Sacramento."
Pursuant to Local Rule 41-6:
A party proceeding pro se shall keep the Court and opposing parties apprised of such party's current address and telephone number, if any. If mail directed by the Clerk to a pro se plaintiff's address of record is returned undelivered by the Postal Service, and if, within fifteen (15) days of the service date, such plaintiff fails to notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of said plaintiff's current address, the Court may dismiss the action with or without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Rule 41-6; see Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988).
Petitioner is ordered to show cause within fifteen (15) days of the date of this why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to inform the Court of his of address.
Failure to file a timely response to this order within the time specified will be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.
Initials of Preparer JM
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.