Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Benedict Bato v. J.D. Hartley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 27, 2011

BENEDICT BATO, PETITIONER,
v.
J.D. HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO PETITION ISSUED DECEMBER 10, 2010 [Doc. 5]

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on November 29, 2010. Petitioner challenges a California Board of Parole hearing finding him unsuitable for release.

On December 10, 2010, this Court issued an Order directing Respondent to file a response to the petition.

On January 24, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Swarthout v. Cooke, ___ U.S.___, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2011 WL 197627 (Jan. 24, 2011) (per curiam). This decision renders the claims presented in the petition non-cognizable for purposes of federal habeas review.

Accordingly, the December 10, 2010, Order to Respond is HEREBY VACATED, and briefing is suspended pending further order of the Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

icido3

20110127

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.