UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 27, 2011
JAMES D. HARTLEY, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER VACATING ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO PETITION ISSUED DECEMBER 2, 2010
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus on November 12, 2010. Petitioner challenges a California Board of Parole hearing finding him unsuitable for release.
On December 2, 2010, this Court issued an Order directing Respondent to file a response to the petition.
On January 24, 2011, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Swarthout v. Cooke, ___ U.S.___, ___ S.Ct. ___, 2011 WL 197627 (Jan. 24, 2011) (per curiam). This decision renders the claims presented in the petition non-cognizable for purposes of federal habeas review.
Accordingly, the December 2, 2010, Order to Respond is HEREBY VACATED, and briefing is suspended pending further order of the Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.