UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
January 31, 2011
TINA WALTER, CHRISTOPHER BAYLESS, AND ERIC SCHUMACHER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Samuel Conti
Robert B. Hawk (SBN 118054) J. Christopher Mitchell (SBN 215639) 2 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor 3 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 4 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 email@example.com 5 firstname.lastname@example.org 6 Attorneys for Defendants HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 7 and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC 8
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2011, Plaintiffs Tina Walter, Christopher Bayless, and Eric Schumacher ("Plaintiffs") filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement and Conditional Class Certification and Related Relief (the "Preliminary Approval Motion");
WHEREAS, also on January 7, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Leave to File Third Amended Complaint, and also filed a proposed Third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "Third Amended Complaint");
WHEREAS, by Clerk's Notice dated January 12, 2011, Judge Conti vacated the January 21, 2011 hearing date on the Preliminary Approval Motion and has taken the Preliminary Approval Motion under submission;
WHEREAS, the Court has not entered an Order on the stipulation granting Plaintiffs leave to file the Third Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, by prior stipulation, Defendants Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Services LLC ("Defendants") are required to respond to the previously filed Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint (the "Second Amended Complaint") on or before January 28, 2011;
WHEREAS, given the pendency of the Preliminary Approval Motion and in the interests of efficiency and economy, the parties agree that Defendants need not answer or otherwise respond on January 28, 2011 to the Second Amended Complaint;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties through their respective counsel, that the deadline for Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint is extended by 30 days, from January 28, 2011 to February 28, 2011.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January ___, 2011
S D U E
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
N IT IS SO U A
Conti R Judge O
O I T
I, Robert B. Hawk, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Joshua 2 Ezrin concurred in this filing. 3 4
DATED: January 27, 2011 HOGAN LOVELLS LLP 5 By /s/ Robert B. Hawk
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.