Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Raymond Mao

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 31, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF
v.
RAYMOND MAO, AND ELISA CHING DEFENDANTS

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.

JERRY L. CHONG (SBN 68757) ALICE W. WONG (SBN 160141) LAW OFFICES OF JERRY L. CHONG & ALICE W. WONG 501 S STREET, SUITE TWO SACRAMENTO, CA 95811 TELEPHONE: (916) 443-7398 FACSIMILE: (916) 443-8941 Attorney for Defendant RAYMOND MAO

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

The parties request that the status conference currently set for January 27, 2011, be continued to March 3, 2011 at 9:00am in Courtroom 7 and stipulate that the time beginning January 27, 2011 and extending through March 3, 2011 be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time so that the counsel for each party may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 USC § 3161(h)(8)(B)(iv).

In particular, counsel for both parties need more time to consider information that may be relevant to their case and sentencing and to negotiate an appropriate disposition. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 USC § 3161(h)(8)(A)

Respectfully Submitted United States Attorney Dated: January 21, 2011

ORDER

The status conference in Case Number CR No. 2: 08-CR-00531-MCE currently set for January 27, 2011 is continued to March 3, 2011 at 9:00 am in Courtroom 7. The time beginning January 27, 2011 and extending through March 3, 2011 is excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The Court finds that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 USA § 3161(h)(7)(A)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20110131

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.