Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David Lee Weaver v. U.S.D.A. Forest

January 31, 2011

DAVID LEE WEAVER,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
U.S.D.A. FOREST, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

CORRECTED ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

(Doc. 1)

Proceeding pro se, Plaintiff David Lee Weaver has filed a tort complaint seeking compensation for personal injury and damage to his vehicle in a collision with a U.S.D.A. Forest Service Vehicle.

I. Screening Requirement

A court has inherent power to control its docket and the disposition of its cases with economy of time and effort for both the court and the parties. Landis v. North American Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 915 (1992). Accordingly, this Court screens all complaints filed by plaintiffs in propria persona to ensure that the action is not frivolous or malicious, that the actions states a claim upon which relief may be granted, and that the complaint does not seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.

"Rule 8(a)'s simplified pleading standard applies to all civil actions, with limited exceptions," none of which applies here. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 512 (2002). Pursuant to Rule 8(a), a complaint must contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief . . . ." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). "Such a statement must simply give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Swierkiewicz, 534 U.S. at 512. Detailed factual allegations are not required, but "[t]hreadbare recitals of the elements of the cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, ___ U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009), citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). "Plaintiff must set forth sufficient factual matter accepted as true, to 'state a claim that is plausible on its face.'" Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. at 1949, quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. While factual allegations are accepted as true, legal conclusions are not. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. at 1949.

Although accepted as true, "[f]actual allegations must be [sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level." Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555 (citations omitted). A plaintiff must set forth "the grounds of his entitlement to relief," which "requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action." Id. at 555-56 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). To adequately state a claim against a defendant, a plaintiff must set forth the legal and factual basis for his claim.

II. Summary of Complaint

While driving northbound on Highway 99 on May 4, 2009, U.S.D.A. Forest Service Employee Mike Ryan, who was driving a Ford Excursion, sideswiped the front driver side of Plaintiff's vehicle. Ryan apologized and advised Plaintiff that he had not seen him.

Ryan provided insurance information before Plaintiff was transported by ambulance to Mercy Hospital in Bakersfield. Mercy Hospital released Plaintiff, directing him to see his primary physician, Dr. Lee, in Tulare, California. Plaintiff has been advised that he requires neck surgery that will cost $100,000.

Despite Ryan's acknowledgment of fault, the U.S.D.A. Forest Service has failed to respond to Plaintiff's claim, repeatedly directing him to various offices. Plaintiff seeks damages sufficient to pay for damage to his vehicle, medical procedures attributable to the accident, and pain and suffering.

III. Discussion

A. Federal Tort Claims Act

Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 ("FTCA"), no claimant for money damages for injury or loss of property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act of a governmental employee may institute a court action unless he or she first presented his or her claim to the appropriate agency and the agency denied the claim in writing and sent by certified or registered mail. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). If the agency has not made a final disposition of the claim within six months, the claimant may elect to treat the agency's inaction as a denial. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). The claimant's action may not exceed the amount set forth in his or her ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.