Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adam Sharpe v. High Desert State Prison

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


January 31, 2011

ADAM SHARPE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. By order filed November 10, 2010, the court determined that plaintiff's complaint stated a cognizable claim for relief against three defendants. The court also construed plaintiff's complaint as containing a request for injunctive relief in the form of an order requiring defendants to provide plaintiff with eye surgery and, in light of the allegations of the complaint, requested the California Attorney General to file, within thirty days, an informal response to that request. The Attorney General has not filed any response to the court's November 10, 2010 order. On December 14, 2010, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process on defendants. Good cause appearing, the court will again direct the California Attorney General to file an informal response to plaintiff's request for eye surgery.

On January 3, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).

The allegations of the complaint before the court appear sufficiently serious that if supported by medical evidence the court might consider requesting the voluntary assistance of counsel in this matter. Plaintiff's complaint is signed under penalty of perjury, but plaintiff has not at this time tendered any evidence in support of his claims beyond the averments of the complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff's request for appointment of counsel will be denied without prejudice to its renewal at a later stage of these proceedings.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to reserve a copy of plaintiff's complaint and a copy of this court's November 10, 2010 order, together with a copy of this order, on Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General.

2. Within ten days from the date of this order, the California Attorney General shall file and serve a response to the request for injunctive relief contained in plaintiff's complaint; and

3. Plaintiff's January 3, 2011 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.

12/kly shar2484.31

20110131

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.