IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 1, 2011
MURRAY STANFORD, PETITIONER,
WARDEN GONZALES, RESPONDENT.
On January 20, 2011, petitioner filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed December 21, 2010, which ordered that petitioner's November 1, 2010 motion for partial summary judgment be construed as supplemental points and authorities in support of the habeas corpus petition, and denied petitioner's December 1, 2010 motion for sanctions. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed December 21, 2010, is affirmed.*fn1