IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 3, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Edward J. Garcia Senior U.S. District Judge
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME
The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from February 4, 2011 to March 25, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. They stipulate that the time between February 4, 2011 and March 25, 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review the discovery provided by the government, consult with the defendant and to further investigate the case. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By:Heiko P. Coppola HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney DATE: February 3, 2011 Dina Santos DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant SO ORDERED. February 3, 2011 Edward J. Garcia
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.