Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Francisco Arellano-Rodriguez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 3, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
FRANCISCO ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Edward J. Garcia Senior U.S. District Judge

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME

The parties request that the status conference in this case be continued from February 4, 2011 to March 25, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. They stipulate that the time between February 4, 2011 and March 25, 2011 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time, so that counsel for the defendant may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T-4. Specifically, defense counsel needs additional time to review the discovery provided by the government, consult with the defendant and to further investigate the case. The parties stipulate and agree that the interests of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A).

Respectfully Submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By:Heiko P. Coppola HEIKO P. COPPOLA Assistant U.S. Attorney DATE: February 3, 2011 Dina Santos DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant SO ORDERED. February 3, 2011 Edward J. Garcia

20110203

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.