Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

James Edward Williams v. Dr. Alexander Distante

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


February 7, 2011

JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
DR. ALEXANDER DISTANTE, N. KUSHNER,
M.D., ROBIN RODRIGUEZ, N.P., R. MUHAMMAD, M.D., DARRIN BRIGHT, M.D., MICHAEL SEPULVEDA, M.D.; AND, ALEXANDER DISTANTE, M.D.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court Judge

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION

The Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dispositive Motion by defendants DARRIN BRIGHT, M.D. and MICHAEL SEPULVEDA, M.D. and all related pleadings were submitted to 22 this Court. The Court, having read and considered the motion and related papers in this matter, and 23 all other matters presented to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby GRANTS the 24 motion and makes the following an Order of this Court:

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion no later than ninety (90) days after this motion is granted. The motion shall be 27 supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If Defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be resolved by dispositive motion, they shall so inform the Court prior to the date the motion is due. All 2 papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which Defendants' motion is filed. Plaintiff is referred to the Court's Order of Service filed August 2, 2010, at Docket No. 3, regarding summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' reply brief shall be filed no later than fifteen (15) days after the date Plaintiff's opposition is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110207

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.