IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 7, 2011
TRACY WATSON, RENEE STALKER,
PAM STALKER AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR O.S., S.W., AND R.W., MINORS,, PLAINTIFFS,
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, CITY OF SANJOSE, ET. AL.,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Ronald M. Whyte United States District Court San Francisco, California
ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. CSB#159747 DENNIS R. INGOLS, ESQ. CSB#236458 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San Jose, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 email@example.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs
*E-FILED - 2/7/11*
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs Tracy Watson and Renee Stalker, and Pam Stalker, as guardian ad litem for O.S., S.W., and R.W.and the County of Santa Clara, as well as all individually named defendants employed by the County of Santa Clara at or during the time of the allegations contained in the Fourth Amended Complaint in this action (specifically including, but not limited to, defendant-employees Norma Sparks, Linda Baum, Sharon Burgan, Jewels Ramirez, Yazmina Letona, Linda Castaldi, Vu Tran, Rima Singh, Aaron West, John Hamilton, Anita Noble, Janet Kahle, Mary Ritter, and David Kearns), that the Fourth Amended Complaint, including all claims and affirmative defenses, are hereby dismissed by Plaintiffs with prejudice.
The Court has already approved the Petition for Minor's Compromise in this matter and the parties stipulate and request that a dismissal with prejudice should be entered at this time.
Each party will bear his or her own costs and attorneys' fees.
All of plaintiffs' claims in the 4th Amended Complaint against the County of Santa Clara and all defendant-employees of the County of Santa Clara are dismissed with prejudice. Each party will bear his or her own costs and attorneys' fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.