The opinion of the court was delivered by: R. Gary Klausner, United States District Judge
Social Security No. 9 3 9 8
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. 02 07 2011
X WITH COUNSEL Myra Sun, DFPD
X GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a finding/verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Embezzlement and Theft of Labor Union Assets pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §501(c) as charged in Count Three of the Indictment.
The Court asked whether there was any reason why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Joan Marie Boucher, is hereby placed on Probation on Count 3 of the Indictment for a term of FIVE (5) YEARS under the following terms and conditions:
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
The defendant shall participate for a period of six months in a home detention program which may include electronic monitoring, GPS, Alcohol Monitoring Unit or automated identification systems and shall observe all rules of such program, as directed by the Probation Officer. Electronic monitoring shall commence on May 1, 2011. The defendant shall maintain a residential telephone line without devices and/or services that may interrupt operation of the monitoring equipment;
The defendant shall pay the costs of Location Monitoring to the contract vendor pursuant to the discretion of the Probation Officer, not to exceed the sum of $12.00 for each day of participation in the electronic monitoring, GPS, and/or voice recognition program. The defendant shall provide payment and proof of payments as directed by the Probation Officer.
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds, lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
The drug testing condition mandated by statute is suspended based on the Court's determination that the defendant poses a low risk of
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $100, ...