The opinion of the court was delivered by: Morrison C. England, Jr. United States District Judge
In this consolidated litigation, Scottsdale Insurance Company, Scottsdale Indemnity Company, Western Heritage Insurance Company and R. Max Williamson (hereinafter referred to as "the Scottsdale Parties" unless otherwise indicated) now seek attorney's fees in this matter, both as successful parties at trial on their own affirmative action against Sovereign General and Martin and Gloria Sullivan (Western Heritage In. Co. v. Sovereign Gen'l Ins. Services, Inc. (E.D. Cal. Case No. 05-cv-01389-MCE-DAD), due to their successful summary judgment motion in Sovereign General's lawsuit (Sovereign Gen'l Ins. Services, Inc. v. Scottsdale Ins. Co., E.D. Cal. Case No. 05-cv-00312-MCE-DAD), and in the wake of the successful rulings they obtained in subsequent appeals to the Ninth Circuit.
Judgment pursuant to the jury's October 1, 2008 verdict in the Western Heritage lawsuit was entered on October 7, 2008. In addition, summary judgment in favor of the Scottsdale Parties was entered by February 20, 2007 as to the suit instituted by Sovereign General.
On October 29, 2008, Sovereign General filed a Notice of Appeal both as to the summary judgment rendered against it in 2007 and the judgment following jury verdict in 2008. On August 29, 2009, while that appeal was pending, the Sullivans filed a Chapter 7 voluntary petition in Bankruptcy Court, Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 09-38120-B-7. Additionally, On September 14, 2009, an involuntary petition was filed against Sovereign. (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No. 09-39673-A-7). ///
In January of 2010, the Bankruptcy Court granted Western Heritage's emergency motion for relief from the automatic stay occasioned by the Sullivan and Sovereign bankruptcy proceedings so that the appeal before the Ninth Circuit could move forward. Thereafter, the matter was argued before the Ninth Circuit, and the court issued its Memorandum decision on April 8, 2010 in the consolidated appeals, affirming this Court's summary judgment dismissing Sovereign's claims, but reversing and remanding the denial of Western Heritage's request for prejudgment interest. Finally, on August 26, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court granted another modification from the automatic bankruptcy stay in the Sullivan matter*fn1 to permit this Court to enter final orders and judgment in this action in a manner consistent with the Ninth Circuit's remand, and for purposes of resolving outstanding attorney's fee requests.
On December 15, 2010, the parties presented a Stipulation and Proposed Order for Judgment to this Court for signature, under the terms of which Sovereign General and the Sullivans agreed to a final judgment in the amount of the jury's verdict ($715,113.29, consistent with this Court's entry of judgment on October 7, 2008), along with an award of prejudgment interest in the amount of $307,872.29 (consistent with the Ninth Circuit's Memorandum decision of April 8, 2010 and its mandate reversing and remanding the calculation of prejudgment interest to this Court).
The parties further stipulated that the final judgment would include an award of attorney's fees in accordance with the Scottsdale Parties' Renewed Attorney's Fees Motion. This Court entered its Order on the parties' Stipulation on December 22, 2010, and entered Judgment pursuant thereto. That leaves the Scottsdale Parties' Renewed Motion for Attorney's Fees, filed concurrently with the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Judgment on December 15, 2010, as the sole outstanding issue for the Court's consideration in this matter.
The Scottsdale Parties seek a total of $1,461,540.83 as successful party attorney's fees, and break that total down to $825,413.24 on summary judgment, $498,862.82 through trial and post trial motions, and $137,264.76 for additional post-trial, appellate and bankruptcy issues. The Scottsdale Parties contend that they are entitled to these fees on several overlapping bases, including the availability of fees under the applicable Arizona law as implicated by the choice of law provisions contained in the parties' agency agreement, or under the indemnification clause of the parties' agency agreement itself.
Despite participating in the Stipulation and Order for Judgment, and agreeing that the Scottsdale parties could properly seek attorney's fees by way of the instant Motion, no opposition to said Motion has been filed either by the Sullivans or by Sovereign. /// /// ///
Given that non-opposition, and good cause appearing, the Scottsdale Parties' Renewed Motion for Attorney's Fees is hereby GRANTED.*fn2 The Court orders that the Court's Judgment dated December 22, 2010 be amended to include the additional sum of $1,461,540.83 in attorney's fees in favor of the Scottsdale Parties and against Sovereign General and Martin and Gloria Sullivan.