Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Orin Bentley v. City and County of San Francisco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 10, 2011

ORIN BENTLEY,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, A GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY; HEATHER FONG, IN HER CAPACITY AS CHIEF OF POLICE FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; AND, DOES 1-25, INCLUSIVE, INDIVIDUALLY, AND IN THEIR CAPACITY AS POLICE OFFICERS FOR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James Larson United States District Court Magistrate Judge

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION

All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. The parties have not yet served written discovery on each other, which will, of course, not be responded to until at least 33 days after service. Also, counsel have not yet conducted any depositions in this case; 2. The parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference until preliminary written discovery and depositions have been completed; and, 3. Therefore, the parties request that this Court extend the time for completion of Settlement Conference from the scheduled date for completion, 02/15/2011, to a date sixty (60) to ninety (90) days from that date; and 4. The parties have been in contact with Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's, Courtroom Deputy Ivy Garcia, regarding the parties' availability for a settlement conference. The parties have tentatively agreed to the date of March 29, 2011 for a settlement conference in this matter. However, should the parties find it necessary to continue that date, the parties are requesting a sixty (60) to ninety (90) day extension period of the current date by which the parties are to conduct the settlement conference.

Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET

By:

GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Dated: February 10, 2011 By: John L.Burris JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Dated: February 10, 2011 By: /s/ Robert A. Bonta ___ ROBERT A. BONTA, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendants

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature, indicated as "/s/ " within this E-filed document. Dated: February 10, 2011 By: /s/ Gayla B. Libet GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

20110210

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.