The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable James Larson United States District Court Magistrate Judge
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STIPULATION
All parties to this action stipulate and agree, by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. The parties have not yet served written discovery on each other, which will, of course, not be responded to until at least 33 days after service. Also, counsel have not yet conducted any depositions in this case; 2. The parties cannot conduct a meaningful Settlement Conference until preliminary written discovery and depositions have been completed; and, 3. Therefore, the parties request that this Court extend the time for completion of Settlement Conference from the scheduled date for completion, 02/15/2011, to a date sixty (60) to ninety (90) days from that date; and 4. The parties have been in contact with Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's, Courtroom Deputy Ivy Garcia, regarding the parties' availability for a settlement conference. The parties have tentatively agreed to the date of March 29, 2011 for a settlement conference in this matter. However, should the parties find it necessary to continue that date, the parties are requesting a sixty (60) to ninety (90) day extension period of the current date by which the parties are to conduct the settlement conference.
LAW OFFICES OF GAYLA B. LIBET
GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Dated: February 10, 2011 By: John L.Burris JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Dated: February 10, 2011 By: /s/ Robert A. Bonta ___ ROBERT A. BONTA, Esq.
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a conformed signature, indicated as "/s/ " within this E-filed document. Dated: February 10, 2011 By: /s/ Gayla B. Libet GAYLA B. LIBET, Esq.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...