Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

The Brix Group, Inc., A California Corporation v. Coastal Wireless

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


February 10, 2011

THE BRIX GROUP, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COASTAL WIRELESS, L.L.C., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DBA COASTAL WIRELESS; MATTHEW S. BLANC, AKA MATT BLANC; JOSHUA ETHAN ENGSTROM, AKA JOSHUA ENGSTROM; ROBERT WHITNEY FORD, AKA ROBERT W. FORD; DAVID MICHAEL LICAVOLI, AKA DAVID LICAVOLI; AND DOES 1 THROUGH , INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Mark S. Carlquist

MARK S. CARLQUIST, ESQ. SB#096341 654 North Santa Cruz Avenue, Suite E Los Gatos, CA 95030 3 Telephone: (408) 354-1955 Facsimile: (408) 354-2127 4 Email: mark@carlquistlaw.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff, The Brix Group, Inc. 6 7 8

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL RE: DEFENDANT DAVID MICHAEL LICAVOLI; ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff The Brix Group, Inc. ("Plaintiff Brix"), and Defendant David Michael Licavoli, aka David Licavoli ("Defendant Licavoli"), through their designated counsel, as follows:

Plaintiff Brix and Defendant Licavoli have reached a full and final settlement of all 28 their respective issues in this action, and a Settlement Agreement between these parties has been fully executed.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Defendant Licavoli is to perform his payment obligation on or before April 8, 2011. The parties shall comply with their Settlement

Agreement, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth.

Plaintiff Brix and Defendant Licavoli hereby stipulate that this Court shall retain 6 jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement until June 1, 2011, in accordance with and 7 under the authority set forth in Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 US 381-8 382. Although the parties hereto are dismissing this action with prejudice, they agree that the

Court will retain jurisdiction over this action and the parties hereto in order to be able to 10 enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that this action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to

FRCP 41 (a)(2), and the Court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement until June 1, 2011.

SO STIPULATED,

IT IS SO ORDERED:

Date: February 28, 2011

U.S. District Judge MAGISTRATE JUDGE

a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this e-filed document.

I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by

Dated: February 10, 2011

20110210

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.