Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Glynn Ward v. Oromde
February 10, 2011
GLYNN WARD,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
OROMDE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Craig M. Kellison United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to the written consent of all parties, this case is before the undersigned as the presiding judge for all purposes, including entry of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
On January 14, 2011, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which was served on plaintiff the same day. On February 3, 2011, the court received notice from plaintiff that he did not receive a complete copy of defendants' motion. Accordingly, defendants reserved the motion and counsel confirmed with plaintiff that he had received a complete copy on February 7, 2011. / / /
As plaintiff had not received a complete copy of the motion for summary judgment until February 7, 2011, he will be provided additional time in which to file his opposition. Therefore, plaintiff may file a response to the motion for summary judgment within 30 days of the date of this order.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...