IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 10, 2011
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable John A. Mendez United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California
CONFERENCE STIPULATION AND
ORDER CONTINUING STATUS
REASONS FOR REQUEST
Both parties, the government and the defense, are actively in the process of negotiating a disposition in this matter. Both parties need more time to determine the existence of particular evidentiary matters which would effect these negotiations. The investigation is continuing. For a meaningful status conference, the parties need additional time beyond the presently scheduled date of February 11, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
The request is hereby made that the status conference be continued to Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. without the necessity of a personal appearance to effectuate this continuance.
For the reasons set forth above, it is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the date for status conference in this case be continued from Tuesday, February 11, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. to Tuesday, March 15, 2010 at 9:30 a.m.
Tuesday, March 15, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
The parties further stipulate that all time included in this continuance be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii)(Local Codes T2 and T4) through March 15, 2011, on the ground that the case is unusual and complex within the meaning of the Speedy Trial Act, for defense preparation, and gathering of evidentiary material which may effect a possible plea negotiation herein, all pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii) and (iv)(Local Codes T2 and T4).
Dated: February 10, 2011
/s/ Mr. Michael D. Anderson, Esq. (by RMH) Assistant United States Attorney Counsel the United States MR. ROBERT M. HOLLEY, Esq. Counsel for Mr. Lavy
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the above calendaring change with respect to the defendant's scheduled status conference, with the stipulated provisions for exclusion of time under the Federal Speedy Trial Act IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.