The opinion of the court was delivered by: Oliver W. Wanger United States District Judge
Discovery Cut-Off: 9/1/11 Non-Dispositive Motion Defendants. Filing Deadline: 9/15/11 Non-Dispositive Motion Ctrm. 10 Hearing Date: 10/14/11 9:00 Deadline: 9/30/11 Dispositive Motion Filing Dispositive Motion Hearing Date: 10/31/11 10:00 Ctrm. 3 9/14/11 10:00 Ctrm. 10 Settlement Conference Date: Pre-Trial Conference Date: 12/5/11 11:00 Ctrm. 3 Ctrm. 3 (CT-3 days) Trial Date: 1/24/12 9:00 I. Date of Scheduling Conference. February 9, 2011.
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER
III. Summary of Pleadings.
1. Plaintiff J & J Sports Productions, Inc., a closed-circuit distributor of sports and entertainment programming, claims that Defendant Santiago Morales, exhibited the "Number One:" The Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. Juan Manuel Marquez of September 19, 2009 (hereinafter "Program") at the establishment the Defendant was operating known as "Dominic's Bar" without the necessary closed-circuit (commercial) license he was required to obtain from the Plaintiff.
2. The Defendant denies exhibition of the Program, and/or any liability of any alleged exhibition of the Program.
IV. Orders Re Amendments To Pleadings.
1. The parties do not anticipate amending the pleadings at this time.
A. Admitted Facts Which Are Deemed Proven Without Further Proceedings.
1. Plaintiff is a corporation licensed under the laws of the State of California.
2. Santiago Morales is an individual who does business in Madera County.
3. Mr. Morales owns and operates Dominic's Bar in Madera, California.
1. Whether or not Defendant exhibited the Number One: The Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. Juan Manuel Marquez fight on or about September 19, 2009.
1. Jurisdiction exists under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 et seq. and 47 U.S.C. §§ 605 et seq. Jurisdiction is also invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 and California Civil Code § 17200.
2. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and 47 U.S.C. §§ 553 and 605, et seq.
3. The substantive law of the State of California governs the supplemental claims.
1. All other legal issues are disputed.
VII. Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction.
1. The parties have not consented to transfer the case to the Magistrate Judge for all ...