UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 15, 2011
FREDRICK JONES JR.,
DIRECTOR OF CORRECTIONS MATTHEW TATE, RESPONDENT.
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY) PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR AN
(Docs. 20, 21)
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303.
On November 17, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations that Petitioner's request for injunctive relief be denied. The findings and recommendations were served on Petitioner on November 17, 2010, and they notified Petitioner that objections were due no later than thirty days after the date of service of the order. Over thirty days have passed, but Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the report and recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed on November 17,
2010, are ADOPTED in full; and
2. Petitioner's motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
0m8i78 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.