IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 15, 2011
MICHAEL BAZLEY, PLAINTIFF,
M. GATES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This order addresses plaintiff's December 30, 2010, January 4, 2011 and January 6, 2011 filings. Dckt. Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27.
On December 30, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to "have defendants responsive pleading stricken from the record and entry of default by the clerk." Dckt. No. 24. Because there is no basis for striking defendants' December 19, 2010 answer from the record or for entering default, plaintiff's motion is denied. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f); Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. See also Dckt. No. 22 (denying plaintiff's earlier filed request for entry of default).
On January 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a declaration and opposition to defendants' answer. Dckt. Nos. 26, 27. Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor this court's local rules authorize such filings. The court will therefore disregard them. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) (listing allowed pleadings, and providing that a reply to an answer is proper only "if the court orders one").
Finally, on January 4, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion "for production/discovery for Receipt of U.S. Marshal Certification of Services." Dckt No. 25. Plaintiff must direct any requests for discovery directly to defendants, and not to the court. Interrogatories, requests for production, requests for admission, responses and proofs of service thereof "shall not be filed with the clerk until there is a proceeding in which the document or proof of service is at issue. When required in a proceeding, only that part of the request and response that is in issue shall be filed." E.D. Cal. Local Rules 250.2-250.4. Accordingly, plaintiff's January 4, 2011 request for production of documents is stricken and the Clerk of the Court shall make a notation on the docket to that effect.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.