Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Microchip Technology, Inc. and v. United Module Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


February 18, 2011

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND
SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., AND KERANOS, LLC, DEFENDANTS. FREESCALE SEMICONDUCOR, INC.,
NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., AND
ANALOG DEVICES, INC. PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., AND KERANOS, LLC, DEFENDANTS. TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., TSMC NORTH
AMERICA, AND UBICOM, INC.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., AND KERANOS, LLC,
DEFENDANTS. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., AND SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 9 PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., AND KERANOS,
LLC,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Time: 1:30 p.m.

Courtroom: Courtroom 4, 5th floor

Date: March 3, 2011

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Theresa E. Norton filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting Defendant's request to file the following documents under seal: (1) Exhibit 20 to the Declaration 5 of Theresa Norton in Support of Defendant Keranos, LLC's Reply in Support of Motions to Exhibit 23 to Norton Decl.; (5) Exhibit 24 to Norton Decl.; (6) Exhibit 30 to Norton Decl.; (7) These documents were filed under seal in the Texas Case, and are appropriately filed under seal 10 in this action as well.

action. This request is too broad, as a motion to seal documents must be "narrowly tailored to 13 seek sealing of only sealable material." Civ. Local Rule 79-5(a). Defendant Keranos, LLC's

Wednesday, February 23, 2011, Defendant is directed to submit: (1) a redacted version of its Reply that can be filed in the public record pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c); and (2) a 17 second motion to file under seal with respect to the confidential version of the Reply. If the 18 redacted version is narrowly tailored to omit only sealable material, the Court will permit the 19 confidential version to be filed under seal. 20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Now before the Court is Defendant Keranos, LLC's Administrative Request to File Documents Under Seal. Upon consideration of the motion, and of the supporting declaration of Dismiss ("Norton Decl."); (2) Exhibit 21 to Norton Decl.; (3) Exhibit to Norton Decl.; (4) Exhibit 65 to Norton Decl.; (8) Exhibit 66 to Norton Decl.; and (9) Exhibit 72 to Norton Decl.

Defendant Keranos, LLC also seeks to file under seal the entirety of its Reply in this

Reply contains much information that is neither sealable nor confidential. Accordingly, by

The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Court Judge

20110218

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.