The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Morrison C. England
JULIA E. VERA (SBN 242739) Law Offices of Julia E. Vera, PLC 3000 T Street, Suite 102 Sacramento, CA 95816 Ofc 916.455.4030 Fax 916.455.4042 Attorney for Defendant LEONEL FAVELA
STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE
IT IS HEREBY stipulated between the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA through its undersigned counsel, Paul Hemesath, Assistant United States Attorney, together with counsel for defendant Leonel Favela, Julia E. Vera, Esq., hereby agree and stipulate that the status conference presently set for February 17, 2011, be continued to May 26, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., thus vacating the presently set status conference.
Further, all of the parties, the United States of America and the defendant as stated above, hereby agree and stipulate that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded under Title 18, United States Code Section 316(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local code T-2 (unusual and complex case) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare) from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 4, 2011, to and including May 26, 2011.
PROCEDURAL STATUS OF THE CASE
On August 19, 2010, the government filed a criminal complaint against all defendants. On September 2, 2010, the government filed an Indictment charging four (4) defendants in Count 1 (conspiracy to manufacture at least 1,000 marijuana plants, Title 21, U.S.C. Sections 846 and 841 (a)(1)).
TIME EXCLUDED UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
The parties (the government and the aforementioned defendant) agree and stipulate that with the voluminous discovery, the complex legal issues involved in the case and the time needed by the defendant to review all of the discovery produced by the government to date, it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in §3161. In addition, the parties stipulate and agree that the continuance requested herein is necessary to provide defense counsel reasonable time to prepare their respective clients' defenses taking into account due diligence and that the interests of justice in granting this reasonable request for a continuance outweighs the best interests of the public and defendants for a speedy trial in this case, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, §3161
(h)(7)(A) and (B)(ii) and (iv), corresponding to Local Code T-2 (unusual and complex case) and Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 2:10-cr-00388-MCE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LEONEL ...