Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Arezou Mansourian; Lauren v. Regents of the University of California

February 18, 2011

AREZOU MANSOURIAN; LAUREN FCD EFB MANCUSO; AND CHRISTINE WING-SI NG,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL.
DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE

Courtroom: 2, 15th Flr. Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr

Complaint filed: December 18, 2003

Trial date: April 26, 2011

1. The parties, by and through their counsel of record, jointly request that the Court issue an Order shortening time to hear and brief Plaintiffs' Motion to Modify Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order to Continue Trial Date ("Motion") on the expedited schedule set forth below, for the reasons set forth in this Stipulation.

2. This action was filed in December 2003. Plaintiffs allege that defendants have violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1621 et seq.) and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (as enforced through 42 U.S.C. § 1983)by denying females equal opportunity to participate in varsity athletics as compared to males at the University of California at Davis from 1998 to 2006. Defendants deny the allegations.

3. On June 23, 2010, the Court issued its Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. (Dkt. 414.)

On September 13, 2010, the Court granted the parties' joint Stipulation and Order to Modify the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, which, (1) extended the Discovery Cut-Off date to October 25, 2010 (not including Individual Defendant financial status discovery), (2) extended the last day to hear dispositive motions to December 6, 2010, and (3) suspended the discovery deadline for financial information from Individual Defendants until after the Court ruled on the (then anticipated) Individual Defendants' motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. 436.)

4. On September 9, 14, and 22, 2010, Defendants filed motions for summary judgment on behalf of each of the individual defendants on the § 1983 claims. (Dkt. 417-34, 437-50, 452-55.) Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed Defendant Larry Swanson on November 8, 2010 (Dkt. 465) and opposed the motions on behalf of the four remaining Defendants on November 9, 2010 (Dkt. 466-83). On December 8, 2010, the Court issued a decision granting in part and denying in part the summary judgment motions filed by the individual Defendants. (Dkt. 509.)

5. On October 8, 2010, during briefing on Defendants' summary judgment motions, Plaintiffs filed a Request for Referral to Settlement Conference (Dkt. 457), which was granted. The Settlement Conference took place on December 16, 2010 before the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller. However, the case did not settle.

6. The current Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order sets this case for trial on April 26, 2011. (Dkt. 414 § VII.) The Final Pretrial Conference set for March 4, 2011 and the deadline to file the Joint Pretrial Conference Statement on February 25, 2011. (Id. § VI.)

7. The current pre-trial schedule requires the Joint Pre-Trial Statement, which demands extensive briefing and pre-trial preparation, to be completed by February 25, 2010, the same date as this Motion, if fully noticed, would be heard. The parties recognize that prompt resolution of Plaintiffs' Motion will allow the parties to engage in pre-trial matters expeditiously and efficiently.

8. On January 25, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Modify Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order to Continue Trial Date. (Dkt. 521.) The parties filed opposing and reply papers on February 1st and 7th, respectively (Dkt. 525, 528) and the Court held a hearing on February 25, 2011. At the hearing, the Court distributed proposed pretrial and trial related dates and requested that the parties further meet and confer to refine the dates. On February 17, 2011, the parties emailed revised dates to the Court, to which the Court agreed.

9. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that this Court modify the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order as follows: Date Event April 15, 2011 Pretrial ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.