Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Charles J. Chatman v. Tyner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 20, 2011

CHARLES J. CHATMAN,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
TYNER, ET AL.,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sandra M. Snyder United States Magistrate Judge

(Doc. 205, 206)

ORDER REQUIRING ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE TO FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR INTERVENTION IN ENFORCING OR VOIDING THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

On September 3, 2010 and September 13, 2010, Plaintiff filed requests for the Court's intervention in enforcing or voiding the settlement agreement in this case. Defendants were required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days. Local Rule 230(l). Private counsel for Defendant Duran complied. However, the Attorney General's office, which should possess the most accurate information as to the status of payment of the settlement monies to Plaintiff, failed to respond.

Accordingly, within thirty (30) days from the date of service of this order, the Deputy Attorney General assigned to this case must file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Plaintiff's requests for the Court's intervention in enforcing or voiding the settlement agreement in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110220

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.