Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Samuel anderson v. Matthew Tate

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 22, 2011

SAMUEL ANDERSON PLAINTIFF,
v.
MATTHEW TATE, ET. AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On January 27, 20011, the court granted plaintiff a 60 day extension to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for additional law library access (Doc. 21). As plaintiff has been granted a 60 day extension he does not need additional law library access, to what he is normally provided. In addition, the issues raised in the complaint and the information that requires amendment does not require extensive legal research.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for additional law library access (Doc. 21) is denied.

20110222

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.