Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

David Florence v. E.R. Stanback

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


February 23, 2011

DAVID FLORENCE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
E.R. STANBACK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew Senior, U.S. District Court Judge

ORDER

Re: Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) [117] The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff David Florence's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d), filed on December 22, 2010 [117]. Having reviewed all papers submitted pertaining to this Motion, the Court NOW FINDS AND RULES AS FOLLOWS:

Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) is DENIED AS MOOT. On February 18, 2011, Courtney E. Black filed a Notice of Appearance [123] informing the Court that Plaintiff David Florence has retained the firm of Courtney E. Black, Attorney at Law to represent him in all aspects of this Action. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for the Appointment of Counsel under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) [117] is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110223

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.