IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
February 24, 2011
MARK SWAGERTY, PLAINTIFF,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge
On August 20, 2010, plaintiff filed his consent to the jurisdiction of the undersigned (docket #5). By order filed December 1, 2010, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file a second amended complaint. In the December 1st order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his amended complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.
For the reasons given in the December 1, 2010, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.