Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Aldo Secaida

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)


February 25, 2011

ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALDO SECAIDA, AN INDIVIDUAL AND D/B/A WWW.BRILLIANTBUYS.CO.UK, AND DOES 1 -- 10, INCLUSIVE,
DEFENDANTS.

*E-Filed 2/25/11*

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE ADR PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated ("Adobe" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel of record, Nicole L. Drey, of J. Andrew Coombs, A P.C., and Defendant Aldo Secaida, an individual and d/b/a www.brilliantbuys.co.uk ("Defendant"), in pro se, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS the Complaint was filed in the above-captioned matter on or about August 13, 2010;

WHEREAS the Court issued a Case Management Scheduling Order ("Order") on or about November 5, 2010;

WHEREAS the Court's Order provided for alternative dispute resolution to be completed by March 4, 2011;

WHEREAS the Parties and assigned mediator held a pre-mediation conference call on or about December 29, 2010. At that time, the Parties scheduled mediation to take place on March 3, 2011, with a further conference call to discuss settlement prior to formal mediation to take place on January 31, 2011;

WHEREAS the Parties and assigned mediator held a further conference call on or about January 31, 2011. At that time, the mediation was rescheduled to March 2, 2011, due to a conflict which had arisen with the mediator, and subsequent conference call was scheduled for February 22, 2011;

WHEREAS, on or about February 14, 2010, an ADR Program Staff Attorney emailed the Parties and mediator informing that the scheduled mediation could not be canceled at Defendant's request;

WHEREAS the Parties and assigned mediator held a third pre-mediation conference call on or about February 22, 2011, at which time Defendant stated that he could not attend the mediation on March 2, 2011, due to travel arrangements being too expensive;

WHEREAS Defendant requested that the mediation be rescheduled to sometime within the following two weeks, beyond the March 4, 2011, deadline, per the Court's Order;

WHEREAS Plaintiff is prepared to attend mediation on March 2, 2011, but does not oppose the continuation of the mediation should the Court grant an extension to the ADR deadline;

WHEREAS the mediator has indicated that he could be available at various times throughout the month of March; and

20110225

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.