The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Susan Illston
LLP LLP OSTETLER OSTETLER AW AW L L Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. T T A A & H & H TTORNEYS LEVELAND C C TTORNEYS LEVELAND AKER A AKER A B B
This Document Relates to Individual Case 19
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER 22 OF SERVICE, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
WHEREAS, plaintiff MetroPCS Wireless, Inc. ("MetroPCS") filed a complaint in the above-captioned case against AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging Devices Corporation, Hannstar Display Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc., Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants"), among other defendants, on December 17, 2010 ("Complaint");
WHEREAS, MetroPCS wishes to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the Stipulating Defendants;
WHEREAS, the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to the Complaint; and
WHEREAS, MetroPCS and the Stipulating Defendants believe that proceeding on a unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties.
LLP LLP OSTETLER OSTETLER L L AW AW T T A A 13 & H C C & H TTORNEYS TTORNEYS LEVELAND LEVELAND AKER AKER A A
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, MetroPCS, on the one hand, and the Stipulating Defendants, on the other hand, as follows: 16
1. The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating Defendants 18 of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of 19 personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.
2. The Stipulating Defendants' deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint will be ninety (90) days from the execution of this stipulation. In 22 computing this time period, Rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern. 23 24 25 26 27
By: Christopher A. Nedeau (CA Bar No. 81297) Carl L. Blumenstein (CA Bar No. 124158) Katharine Chao (CA Bar No. 247571) NOSSAMAN LLP 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4799 (415) 398-3600 (Phone) (415) 398-2438 (Facsimile) email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com ...