Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Xilinx, Inc v. Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION


February 28, 2011

XILINX, INC.,
v.
PLAINTIFF, INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND I LP, INVENTION INVESTMENT FUND II LP, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES, LLC, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES MANAGEMENT LLC, INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC, AND INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATED EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Plaintiff Xilinx, Inc. ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Invention Investment Fund I LP, Invention Investment Fund II LP, Intellectual Ventures, LLC, Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC, Intellectual 28 -1- Ventures I LLC, and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (collectively, "Defendants"), pursuant to Civil Local 2 Rules 6-1 and 6-2, respectfully request that the Court enter the following stipulation regarding the time 3 for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. The parties now 4 AGREE AND STIPULATE that the time for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the 5 Complaint is extended through and including April 11, 2011.

1. Reason for Extension of Time.

At the request of Defendants, the parties have met and conferred and jointly agree to the requested extension for the convenience of the parties. 9

2. Prior Time Modifications.

There have been no previous time modifications in this case.

3. Effect of Modification.

The requested extension will have no effect on the rest of the schedule in this action.

Respectfully submitted,

BLACK & WASHKO LLP

Frank M. Washko Bradford J. Black

Frank M. WashkoAttorneys for Defendants

Dated: February 28, 2011

JONES DAY Behrooz Shariati

Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Frank M. 2 Washko hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. E I T D S T S RI T T A C C U DATED: S O 10 D R February 28, 2011 E 11 T T Honorable Laurel Beeler I N IS SO ORDERED IT

U A I N 13 N R O O R T I F L H 15 E A R C N F DISTRICT O

20110228

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.