Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Lynn Odrick v. Union Bancal Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 1, 2011

LYNN ODRICK PLAINTIFF(S),
v.
UNION BANCAL CORP., ET AL.
DEFENDANT(S).

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ✔9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ✔9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) mediation

Parties are in the process of selecting a private mediator. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.

✔9 other requested deadline

September 30, 2011

Dated 2/22/2011

Michael Morrison Attorney for Plaintiff Dated 2/22/2011 Eric Steinert Attorney for Defendant

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation."

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) ✔9 Mediation 9 Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session 9 90 days from the date of this order.

✔9 other

September 30, 2011

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michael S. Morrison, an employee of the City of Santa Monica, certify that on February 22, 2011, caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] SELECTING ADR PROCESS to be filed with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to the following counsel who has registered for receipt of documents filed in this matter:

20110301

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.