Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Luis Carlos Vasquez.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 2, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
LUIS CARLOS VASQUEZ.
DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb

Date: March 28, 2011 Time: 8:30 a.m.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, William Wong, Assistant United States Attorney, and Courtney Fein, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for LUIS CARLOS VASQUEZ, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for March 7, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., and reset it for March 28, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.

Counsel for the defendant requires further time to review discovery, discuss the contents of the discovery with her client, and continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through March 28, 2011, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting the defendant's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) (Local Code T4). Dated: March 2, 2011 Respectfully submitted, DANIEL BRODERICK Federal Defender C. Fein COURTNEY FEIN Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for LUIZ CARLOS VASQUEZ Dated: March 2, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney C.Fein for WILLIAM WONG Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The status conference is continued to March 28, 2011, at 8:30 a.m. The court finds that a continuance is necessary for the reasons stated above, and further finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is therefore excluded from the date of this order through March 28, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv).

20110302

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.