Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Gwendolyn Mandosia v. George Soros et al

March 4, 2011

GWENDOLYN MANDOSIA
v.
GEORGE SOROS ET AL



The opinion of the court was delivered by: The Honorable Gary Allen Feess

LINK: 10

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Title

Present: The Honorable GARY ALLEN FEESS

Renee Fisher None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.

Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:

None None

Proceedings: (In Chambers)

ORDER REMANDING CASE

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gwendolyn Mandosia ("Plaintiff") brought suit against Defendants George Soros, Michael Dell, IndyMac, IndyMac Venture LLC, IndyMac Mortgage Services, OneWest Bank FSB, and IndyMac Bank FSB (collectively, "Defendants") in Los Angeles County Superior Court. (Docket No. 1, Not. of Removal at 2.) On January 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in that court. (Not., Ex. A [First Am. Compl. ("FAC")].) On February 14, 2011, Defendants removed the action to this Court on the basis of federal question jurisdiction.

On February 17, 2011, Plaintiff filed an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order enjoining the foreclosure sale of her home, and (2) an ex parte application for stay of enforcement of some unspecified judgment. (Docket No. 6, __.) The Court denied the application for the TRO enjoining the foreclosure sale on the grounds (1) that the allegations had no basis in the complaint and (2) that Plaintiff sought to enjoin a party, T.D. Service Company, who was not a defendant in the action. (Docket No. 9, 2/17/11 Order.) The Court also denied the application for a stay of enforcement of judgment because the Court could not ascertain what judgment Plaintiff asks the Court to enjoin. (Id.)

In remedying the deficiencies identified in the Court's February 17 Order, Plaintiff has now filed an ex parte application for leave to file a second amended complaint. (Docket No. 10.) She also files an ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.