Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Mary C. Yarum v. Alliedbarton Security Services Lp

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


March 7, 2011

MARY C. YARUM,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES LP, AND DOES 1 THROUGH 100, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

On February 4, 2011, Defendant AlliedBarton Security Services LP moved for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 60. A hearing on AlliedBarton's motion was set for March 24, 2011. Under Civil Local Rule 7-3, Plaintiff Mary Yarum had until March 3, 2011 to file either an opposition or 20 a statement of nonopposition to AlliedBarton's motion. As of this Order, Yarum had not filed 21 either an opposition or a statement of nonopposition. The Court notes, however, that the Certification of ADR Session, filed February 18, 2011, represents that the parties fully settled their 23 dispute through mediation. Dkt. No. 65.

If the parties have settled their case, they shall file a stipulated notice of voluntary dismissal by March 10, 2011. Otherwise, the March 24, 2011 motion hearing will remain as set. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110307

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.