Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Microchip Technology, Inc. and Silicon Storage Technology, Inc v. United Module Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION


March 7, 2011

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND SILICON STORAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
PLAINTIFFS,
v.
UNITED MODULE CORP., AND KERANOS, LLC,
DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge

For the Northern District of California United States District Court

CASE NO.: CV-10-05196-LHK

CASE NO.: CV-10-05290-LHK

CASE NO.: CV-11-00430-LHK

Related Cases:

ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICATION REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION

FREESCALE SEMICONDUCOR, INC., NATIONAL SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., and ANALOG DEVICES, INC. FOR STAY AND ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC, Defendants.

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., TSMC NORTH AMERICA, and UBICOM, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, LLC, Defendants.

willing to stay these cases and participate in alternative dispute resolution. On March 7, 2011, the 18 parties filed a stipulation seeking stay of these related cases until June 6, 2011. See March 7, 2011 19

Joint Stipulation [dkt. #64]. The parties state that they will attempt to agree on an ADR process, 20 and "if such an agreement is reached," they will engage in some form of ADR. 21

22 23 speculative representations that the parties may engage in ADR. If, however, the parties select a specific form of ADR by Thursday, March 10, 2011, the Court will defer ruling upon the pending 25 motions until June 6, 2011. Otherwise, the Court will issue its ruling promptly. The parties shall 26 27 28

ORDER SEEKING CLARIFICIATION REGARDING PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., LLC, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED MODULE CORP., and KERANOS, 12 Defendants.

During the March 3, 2011 hearing on the pending motions, all parties indicated they may be

The Court is prepared to rule on the pending motions, and will not delay its ruling based on

file their election of how they wish to proceed by March 10, 2011. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20110307

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.