The opinion of the court was delivered by: John F. Walter, U. S. District Judge
Social Security No. 2 3 7 2
JUDGMENT AND PROBATION/COMMITMENT ORDER
In the presence of the attorney for the government, the defendant appeared in person on this date. March 07 2011
x WITH COUNSEL Kim Savo, DFPD and Christine Jonan, DFPD
x GUILTY, and the court being satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea.
NOLO CONTENDERE NOT GUILTY
There being a verdict of GUILTY, defendant has been convicted as charged of the offense(s) of: Conspiracy to Use Fire During Commission of a Felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(m) [ct 1]; Bank Larceny in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) [ct 2, 4]; Use of Fire During Commission of a Felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(1) [ct 3, 5] as charged in the Five-Count Second Superseding Indictment filed on August 13, 2010
The Court asked whether defendant had anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced. Because no sufficient cause to the contrary was shown, or appeared to the Court, the Court adjudged the defendant guilty as charged and convicted and ordered that:
Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, it is the judgment of the Court that the defendant, Samuel Anthony Eaton, is hereby committed on counts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the 5-count second superseding indictment to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of 361 months. This term consists of 1 month on each of counts 1, 2 and 4, to be served concurrently with each other, 120 months on count 3 and 240 months on count 5, to be served consecutively to each other, and consecutively to counts 1, 2, and 4.
Upon release from imprisonment, the defendant shall be placed on supervised release for a term of three years. This term consists of three years on each of counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, all such terms to run concurrently under the following
The defendant shall comply with the rules and regulations of the U. S. Probation Office and General Order 05-02;
During the period of community supervision the defendant shall pay the special assessment and restitution in accordance with this judgment's orders pertaining to such payment;
The defendant shall apply all monies received from income tax refunds to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation. In addition, the defendant shall apply all monies received from lottery winnings, inheritance, judgments and any anticipated or unexpected financial gains to the outstanding court-ordered financial obligation; and
The defendant shall cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from the defendant.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay to the United States a special assessment of $500, which is due immediately.
It is ordered that the defendant shall pay restitution in the total amount of $276,134 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
The amount of restitution ordered shall be ...