Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

John Montalvo v. Malfi

March 7, 2011

JOHN MONTALVO, PETITIONER,
v.
MALFI, RESPONDENT.



ORDER

On February 24, 2011, petitioner filed a motion asking that this court reconsider its February 2, 2011 order adopting the magistrate judge's November 23, 2010 findings and recommendations thereby dismissing this action.

A district court may reconsider a ruling under either Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) or 60(b). See Sch. Dist. Number. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). "Reconsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if there is an intervening change in controlling law." Id. at 1263.

Petitioner does not present newly discovered evidence suggesting this matter should not be dismissed. Furthermore, the court finds that, after a de novo review of this case, the February 2, 2011 order adopting the November 23, 2010 findings and recommendations is neither manifestly unjust nor clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's February 24, 2011 motion for reconsideration is denied.

20110307

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.