The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER ON PARTIES' STIPULATED REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER (Docket No. 10)
On March 3, 2011, the parties filed a stipulated request for a revised scheduling order. (Doc. 10.) The parties stated that they had agreed to continue all of the remaining scheduling dates in the litigation, including the trial date, to allow the parties to fully prepare the case for trial.
The Court will grant the continuance. While the Court can accommodate the new trial date proposed by the parties, some of the other proposed dates do not allow sufficient time between the events. Therefore, the Court has not adopted all of the dates proposed by the parties.
The schedule will be revised as follows:
Event Previous Deadline Revised Deadline Non Expert Discovery March 14, 2011 May 26, 2011 Expert Disclosure March 15, 2011 May 27, 2011 Supp. Expert Disclosure March 21, 2011 June 3, 2011 Expert Discovery April 4, 2011 June 24, 2011 Non-Disp. Motion Filing Date April 11, 2011 June 29, 2011 Hearing for Non-Disp. Motions May 11, 2011 July 27, 2011 Disp. Motion Filing Date May 24, 2011 August 2, 2011 Hearing for Disp. Motions July 5, 2011 September 6, 2011 Pre-Trial Conference August 24, 2011 October13, 2011 Settlement Conference March 10, 2011 June 23, 2011 Trial Date October 18, 2011 November 29, 2011
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' request for an extension of their scheduling deadlines is GRANTED as set forth above.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...