UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
March 9, 2011
MARIPOSA COUNTY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Sheila K. Oberto United States Magistrate Judge
ORDER ON PARTIES' STIPULATED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER
(Docket No. 27)
On March 7, 2011, the parties filed a stipulated request for a revised scheduling order. (Doc. 27.) The parties stated that they had agreed to continue all of the remaining scheduling dates in the litigation, including the trial date, because the attorney representing Defendants will be taking maternity leave during the dates on which the trial is currently set. (Doc. 27, ¶3.)
The parties have stated good cause, and the Court will grant a continuance. While the Court can accommodate some of the new dates proposed by the parties, other dates have been changed to accommodate the Court's schedule and to allow sufficient time between events. The Court has continued the dates for the non-dispositive motions filing deadline and the hearing date on nondispositive motions. Therefore, the Court has not adopted all of the dates proposed by the parties, and the schedule deadlines will be revised as follows:
Event Previous Deadline Revised Deadline
Expert Discovery February 22, 2011 September 16, 2011 Non-Disp. Motion Filing March 22, 2011 September 21, 2011 Hearing for Non-Disp. Motions April 20, 2011 October 19, 2011 Disp. Motion Filing April 22, 2011 October 28, 2011 Hearing for Disp. Motions June 6, 2011 December 12, 2011 Pre-Trial Conference July 20, 2011 January 18, 2012 Settlement Conference April 7, 2011 May 24, 2011 Trial Date September 7, 2011 March 13, 2012 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' request for an extension of their scheduling deadlines is GRANTED as set forth above.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.