Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Ester Ellen Nelson v. Joseph Petterle
March 11, 2011
ESTER ELLEN NELSON, PETITIONER,
v.
JOSEPH PETTERLE, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge
Petitioner filed a "Notice that Identifying Information Apparently was Not Removed from Papers Removing the Case to Federal Court" on March 11, 2011, indicating "identifying information about [a minor] was not deleted" from "Defendant's papers removing this case from State Court to Federal Court." (ECF No. 17.)
A review of Respondent's "Notice of Removal" reveals that multiple pages of Exhibit 1 thereto contain identifying information prohibited by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a).
Therefore, Respondent shall file a redacted copy of Exhibit 1 to his Notice of Removal, which conforms to Rule 5.2(a)(1)-(3) and Local Rule 140(a)(i),(iii) and (iv) no later than March 14, 2011.
Further, the Clerk of the Court shall file the original Exhibit 1 to the "Notice of Removal" under seal.
© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...