Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America v. Ranch Road

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA


March 11, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
RANCH ROAD, GEORGETOWN, CALIFORNIA, EL DORADO COUNTY, DATE: N/A APN: 062-030-31-100, INCLUDING ) TIME: N/A ALL APPURTENANCES AND COURTROOM: N/A IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garland E. Burrell, Jr. United States District Judge

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DAVID T. SHELLEDY Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2799 Attorneys for Plaintiff

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND STIPULATION TO STAY ORDER [PROPOSED] REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4040 TIN

Plaintiff United States of America and claimant Patricia Albright, by and through their respective counsel, and claimant Albert G. Stoll, appearing in propria persona, hereby stipulate that a stay is necessary in the above-entitled action, and request that the Court enter an order staying further proceedings for six months pending the outcome of a related criminal investigation against claimant Patricia Albright.

1. Claimant Patricia Albright filed a Verified Statement of Interest to the defendant real property on January 18, 2011, and filed a Corrected Answer to the complaint on January 28, 2011. Claimant Albert G. Stoll filed a Verified Claim to the

1 Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order defendant real property regarding his lien holder interest on February 8, 2011, and filed an Answer to the complaint on February 16, 2011.

2. The stay is requested pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1), 981(g)(2), and 21 U.S.C. § 881(i). The United States contends that the defendant real property was used to facilitate and constitutes proceeds traceable to a violation of federal drug laws (cultivation of marijuana) and is therefore subject to forfeiture to the United States. In addition, the United States contends that the defendant real property was involved in or traceable to a violation of 31 U.S.C. § 5324(a)(3) (structuring). Claimant Patricia Albright denies these allegations.

3. To date claimant Patricia Albright, the person on title to the defendant real property, has not been charged with any criminal offense by state, local, or federal authorities, and the statute of limitations has not expired on potential criminal charges. Nevertheless, the plaintiff intends to depose claimant Patricia Albright regarding her claim to the defendant real property, the facts surrounding the cultivation of marijuana plants on this property, and the financial transactions involved in the purchase of the defendant real property. If discovery proceeds at this time, claimant Patricia Albright will be placed in the difficult position of either invoking her Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination which could interfere with her ability to pursue her claim to the defendant real property, or waiving her Fifth Amendment right and submitting to a deposition and potentially incriminating herself. If she invokes her Fifth Amendment right, the plaintiff will be deprived of the ability to

2 Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order explore the factual basis for the claim she filed with this court.

4. In addition, claimant Patricia Albright intends to depose the law enforcement agents involved in this investigation. Allowing depositions of the law enforcement officers at this time would adversely affect the ability of federal authorities to investigate the underlying criminal conduct.

5. The parties recognize that proceeding with this action at this time has potential adverse affects on the investigation of the underlying criminal conduct and/or upon claimant Patricia Albright's ability to prove her claim to the defendant real property and assert any defenses to forfeiture. For these reasons, the parties jointly request that this matter be stayed for six months. At that time the parties will advise the court of the status of the criminal investigation, if any, and will advise the court whether a further stay is necessary.

6. While this case is stayed claimant Patricia Albright agrees to keep current all payments due to Albert G. Stoll under the promissory note dated May 6, 2008, in the original principal amount of $34,000.00, and secured by the deed of trust recorded in El Dorado County on May 9, 2008, encumbering the defendant real property. A Transfer and Assignment of Deed of Trust and Assignment of Rents was recorded in El Dorado County on July 17, 2008, transferring and assigning the note and Deed of Trust for the defendant real property to claimant Albert G. Stoll.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Stipulation to Stay Further Proceedings and Order

By:

DAVID T. SHELLEDY Assistant U.S. Attorney

Dated: 3-11-2011

BRENDA GRANTLAND, ESQ.

Attorney for claimant Patricia Albright

Dated: 3/8/11

ALBERT G. STOLL Claimant appearing in propria persona

(Signatures retained by attorney)

ORDER

For the reasons set forth above, this matter is stayed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1), 981(g)(2), and 21 U.S.C. § 881(i) for six months. On or before September 16, 2011, the parties will advise the court whether a further stay is necessary.

The pretrial scheduling conference, currently scheduled for 4/25/11, is rescheduled for October 3, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 14, 2011

20110311

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.